<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 182 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of credit to the appellants for allegedly receiving only cenvatable invoices without corresponding goods. The decision was based on the benefit of doubt in favor of the appellants regarding the receipt of goods against invoices, supported by payment through account payee cheque. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of proper investigation procedures, absence of opportunities for cross-examination, and examination of involved parties, leading to the decision in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:57:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 182 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the denial of credit to the appellants for allegedly receiving only cenvatable invoices without corresponding goods. The decision was based on the benefit of doubt in favor of the appellants regarding the receipt of goods against invoices, supported by payment through account payee cheque. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of proper investigation procedures, absence of opportunities for cross-examination, and examination of involved parties, leading to the decision in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>