<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 41 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22698</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that rediscounting charges paid to the Industrial Development Bank of India by a banking company should be allowed as deductions from gross receipts and not included in chargeable interest. However, the court declined to address the inclusion of commission received on the purchase of inland bills in chargeable interest due to insufficient reasoning provided by the Tribunal, directing a reconsideration with detailed explanations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:51:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 41 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22698</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that rediscounting charges paid to the Industrial Development Bank of India by a banking company should be allowed as deductions from gross receipts and not included in chargeable interest. However, the court declined to address the inclusion of commission received on the purchase of inland bills in chargeable interest due to insufficient reasoning provided by the Tribunal, directing a reconsideration with detailed explanations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>