<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 181 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396512</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the Commissioner to unblock the portal for the petitioner to access and procure the necessary Forms under the CST Act. The court held that the Commissioner could not withhold Form C issuance as no order had been passed under Rule 5(4)(ii) at the time of filing the petition. The judgment was ordered to be uploaded on the website, and a copy was forwarded to the counsel via email.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 15:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 181 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396512</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the Commissioner to unblock the portal for the petitioner to access and procure the necessary Forms under the CST Act. The court held that the Commissioner could not withhold Form C issuance as no order had been passed under Rule 5(4)(ii) at the time of filing the petition. The judgment was ordered to be uploaded on the website, and a copy was forwarded to the counsel via email.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>