https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288986 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, holding that Zinc Dross and Zinc Ash generated during the galvanisation process are not chargeable to excise duty. Citing precedents such as Hindalco Industries Limited Vs UoI and Bajaj Auto Ltd Vs CCE Aurangabad, the Tribunal determined that these by-products do not attract duty as they do not arise from the manufacturing process. Consequently, the demand for recovery of short-paid duty amounting to &8377;36,48,510/- for the period March 2005 to March 2008 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief under the law. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:47:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288986 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, holding that Zinc Dross and Zinc Ash generated during the galvanisation process are not chargeable to excise duty. Citing precedents such as Hindalco Industries Limited Vs UoI and Bajaj Auto Ltd Vs CCE Aurangabad, the Tribunal determined that these by-products do not attract duty as they do not arise from the manufacturing process. Consequently, the demand for recovery of short-paid duty amounting to &8377;36,48,510/- for the period March 2005 to March 2008 was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any necessary relief under the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 30 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288986