<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288987</link>
    <description>Once the statutory detention period under Section 167(2) expires without filing of the final report, the accused acquires an independent right to default bail if prepared to furnish bail. An earlier bail order on different conditions does not bar invocation of that statutory remedy after the earlier order has worked itself out. The right to release under Section 167(2) cannot be defeated by onerous or unrealistic conditions, including substantial cash-security requirements, if they effectively prevent compliance. Bail conditions may secure appearance, but they must remain reasonable and must not nullify the statutory benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 09:47:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288987</link>
      <description>Once the statutory detention period under Section 167(2) expires without filing of the final report, the accused acquires an independent right to default bail if prepared to furnish bail. An earlier bail order on different conditions does not bar invocation of that statutory remedy after the earlier order has worked itself out. The right to release under Section 167(2) cannot be defeated by onerous or unrealistic conditions, including substantial cash-security requirements, if they effectively prevent compliance. Bail conditions may secure appearance, but they must remain reasonable and must not nullify the statutory benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>