https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288992 The exemption application was allowed subject to exceptions. The writ petition challenging the impugned order was partially withdrawn, with prayers (b) and (c) dismissed. The constitutionality challenges of CGST Act provisions were withdrawn and dismissed. The challenge against the ultra vires rule in the Anti-Profiteering proceeding was also withdrawn and dismissed. The petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the principal profiteered amount in two equal monthly instalments for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288992 The exemption application was allowed subject to exceptions. The writ petition challenging the impugned order was partially withdrawn, with prayers (b) and (c) dismissed. The constitutionality challenges of CGST Act provisions were withdrawn and dismissed. The challenge against the ultra vires rule in the Anti-Profiteering proceeding was also withdrawn and dismissed. The petitioner was directed to deposit 50% of the principal profiteered amount in two equal monthly instalments for further proceedings. Case-Laws GST Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288992