https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288978 A Hindu religious endowment deed is to be construed by its dominant intention as gathered from the whole instrument: repeated declarations that property is dedicated to the deity absolutely point to full vesting in the deity, and provisions for Shebait residence, maintenance, remuneration, worship, and family arrangements are treated as incidents of the endowment rather than retained beneficial ownership. The text also states that Order 41 Rule 33 CPC is a discretionary power meant to avoid inconsistent decrees, but it does not ordinarily reopen a decree that has already become final in favour of non-appealing parties unless such intervention is necessary to make the appellate decree workable and consistent. en-us Mon, 29 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:15:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288978 A Hindu religious endowment deed is to be construed by its dominant intention as gathered from the whole instrument: repeated declarations that property is dedicated to the deity absolutely point to full vesting in the deity, and provisions for Shebait residence, maintenance, remuneration, worship, and family arrangements are treated as incidents of the endowment rather than retained beneficial ownership. The text also states that Order 41 Rule 33 CPC is a discretionary power meant to avoid inconsistent decrees, but it does not ordinarily reopen a decree that has already become final in favour of non-appealing parties unless such intervention is necessary to make the appellate decree workable and consistent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288978