<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 687 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration as the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked reasoning on classifying the appellant as a Management Consultant for tax purposes based on software sales. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed examination of the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the essential ingredients for inclusion as a Management Consultant. The Tribunal also directed the Commissioner to thoroughly assess the exemption claim under Notification No. 15/2004-Service Tax for Enterprise Resource Planning software systems and provide a comprehensive decision within four months, allowing the appellant to contest effectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 12:51:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 687 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for reconsideration as the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked reasoning on classifying the appellant as a Management Consultant for tax purposes based on software sales. The Tribunal emphasized the need for detailed examination of the appellant&#039;s contentions regarding the essential ingredients for inclusion as a Management Consultant. The Tribunal also directed the Commissioner to thoroughly assess the exemption claim under Notification No. 15/2004-Service Tax for Enterprise Resource Planning software systems and provide a comprehensive decision within four months, allowing the appellant to contest effectively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>