<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (4) TMI 329 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288972</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision classifying products as Ayurvedic medicines under Tariff Item 68. Refund eligibility hinges on passing on amounts to purchasers, as per Section 11B of the Central Excise and Salt Act. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 12:44:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (4) TMI 329 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288972</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision classifying products as Ayurvedic medicines under Tariff Item 68. Refund eligibility hinges on passing on amounts to purchasers, as per Section 11B of the Central Excise and Salt Act. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>