https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396508 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should have pursued the prescribed appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The court concluded that the matter did not stand on the footing of a clerical error or oversight, and the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was not appropriate in this case. en-us Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396508 The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the petitioner should have pursued the prescribed appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST Act. The court concluded that the matter did not stand on the footing of a clerical error or oversight, and the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was not appropriate in this case. Case-Laws GST Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396508