https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288968 A registered instrument was held to be a mortgage deed, not an outright sale, because it recorded an advance of money, delivery of possession, a fixed redemption period, and obligations consistent with mortgage terms. An unregistered later document could not be used to change or prove the character of a transaction affecting immovable property, as the registration bar applied to such instruments. On appellate relief, the High Court was not justified in granting rendition of accounts when the plaintiff had not appealed against the decree granting redemption, so that additional relief was set aside while the redemption decree otherwise stood. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:58:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288968 A registered instrument was held to be a mortgage deed, not an outright sale, because it recorded an advance of money, delivery of possession, a fixed redemption period, and obligations consistent with mortgage terms. An unregistered later document could not be used to change or prove the character of a transaction affecting immovable property, as the registration bar applied to such instruments. On appellate relief, the High Court was not justified in granting rendition of accounts when the plaintiff had not appealed against the decree granting redemption, so that additional relief was set aside while the redemption decree otherwise stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Feb 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288968