<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 92 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision allowing the assessee&#039;s claim for bifurcation of receipts on account of administrative charges and commission over the hire-purchase duration. The U. P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited distributed discount, profits, and administrative charges over the hire-purchase period. The Court found that distributing the discount and administrative charges over the hire-purchase duration was justified as the Corporation received these amounts gradually with instalment payments. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of administrative charges covering various expenses over the hire-purchase period was accepted, resulting in a ruling in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:27:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 92 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner&#039;s decision allowing the assessee&#039;s claim for bifurcation of receipts on account of administrative charges and commission over the hire-purchase duration. The U. P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited distributed discount, profits, and administrative charges over the hire-purchase period. The Court found that distributing the discount and administrative charges over the hire-purchase duration was justified as the Corporation received these amounts gradually with instalment payments. The Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of administrative charges covering various expenses over the hire-purchase period was accepted, resulting in a ruling in favor of the assessee against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>