<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 167 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396498</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the direction imposing penalties on 16 entities for violating SEBI regulations related to trading in a specific scrip. Despite prima facie violations, penalties were deemed unwarranted due to lack of concrete evidence and the liquidity of the scrip. The appellants were cautioned against engaging in similar trading practices in the future, emphasizing compliance with securities regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:37:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 167 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396498</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the direction imposing penalties on 16 entities for violating SEBI regulations related to trading in a specific scrip. Despite prima facie violations, penalties were deemed unwarranted due to lack of concrete evidence and the liquidity of the scrip. The appellants were cautioned against engaging in similar trading practices in the future, emphasizing compliance with securities regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>