<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 695 - Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288964</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs used in job-work manufacture of goods covered by Notification No. 214/86-CE was available where the principal manufacturer cleared the finished goods on payment of duty. The entitlement turned on whether the final product could be treated as exempted goods; because excise duty was in fact paid at the stage of clearance by the principal manufacturer, the credit chain remained intact and the inputs did not lose credit eligibility. The Tribunal noted that the point had already been settled by prior decisions applying the same principle, and the disallowance of credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 11:35:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 695 - Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288964</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs used in job-work manufacture of goods covered by Notification No. 214/86-CE was available where the principal manufacturer cleared the finished goods on payment of duty. The entitlement turned on whether the final product could be treated as exempted goods; because excise duty was in fact paid at the stage of clearance by the principal manufacturer, the credit chain remained intact and the inputs did not lose credit eligibility. The Tribunal noted that the point had already been settled by prior decisions applying the same principle, and the disallowance of credit was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>