<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (10) TMI 241 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288954</link>
    <description>A Central Excise appeal before the Supreme Court was dismissed, leaving the lower order undisturbed. The text provides no reasoning on classification, duty liability, limitation, or other substantive excise issues, so no further legal principle can be stated from the available material. The only operative information is the dismissal of the civil appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 17:56:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (10) TMI 241 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288954</link>
      <description>A Central Excise appeal before the Supreme Court was dismissed, leaving the lower order undisturbed. The text provides no reasoning on classification, duty liability, limitation, or other substantive excise issues, so no further legal principle can be stated from the available material. The only operative information is the dismissal of the civil appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>