<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 1005 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288951</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the interlocutory application to amend the cause title, permitting correction of the party designation in the appeal record. Applying the binding precedent in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd., the Court found the appeal could not be sustained and dismissed it. The order reflects direct reliance on the cited Supreme Court decision as the controlling authority for disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 1005 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288951</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the interlocutory application to amend the cause title, permitting correction of the party designation in the appeal record. Applying the binding precedent in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd., the Court found the appeal could not be sustained and dismissed it. The order reflects direct reliance on the cited Supreme Court decision as the controlling authority for disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>