<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 153 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the sale of windmills as a slump sale and compute long-term capital gains under section 50B. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections, confirming that the windmills constitute a separate undertaking and that the computation of capital gains was correctly done under the special provisions of section 50B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 153 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the sale of windmills as a slump sale and compute long-term capital gains under section 50B. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections, confirming that the windmills constitute a separate undertaking and that the computation of capital gains was correctly done under the special provisions of section 50B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>