<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 151 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The denial of exemption under section 10(24) for interest and rental income was challenged by the Trade Union, citing non-representation as the reason for missing documentary evidence submission. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid due to the A.O.&#039;s failure to accept the belated return and denial of exemption without considering evidence. Dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) due to non-representation was set aside, granting the assessee a chance for a fair hearing. The non-acceptance of TDS credit was not extensively discussed, with the Tribunal allowing the appeal for statistical purposes only.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:42:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 151 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment. The denial of exemption under section 10(24) for interest and rental income was challenged by the Trade Union, citing non-representation as the reason for missing documentary evidence submission. The reassessment proceedings were deemed invalid due to the A.O.&#039;s failure to accept the belated return and denial of exemption without considering evidence. Dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) due to non-representation was set aside, granting the assessee a chance for a fair hearing. The non-acceptance of TDS credit was not extensively discussed, with the Tribunal allowing the appeal for statistical purposes only.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>