https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288950 A quasi-judicial transport authority could not sustain suspension of a public carrier permit on the basis of an alleged smuggling offence where the competent criminal court had already discharged the driver on the same facts before the administrative order was finalised. The authority was bound to take account of the criminal court's final finding, and it could not proceed as if the offence had still been established. The suspension order and the appellate order were therefore unsustainable and were quashed. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Jul 2020 12:39:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288950 A quasi-judicial transport authority could not sustain suspension of a public carrier permit on the basis of an alleged smuggling offence where the competent criminal court had already discharged the driver on the same facts before the administrative order was finalised. The authority was bound to take account of the criminal court's final finding, and it could not proceed as if the offence had still been established. The suspension order and the appellate order were therefore unsustainable and were quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Sep 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288950