<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1281 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288938</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The CIT&#039;s invocation of revisionary powers was deemed unjustified as it relied on the AO&#039;s proposal without independent assessment. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s directions were a re-evaluation of existing facts, not permissible under Section 263. It emphasized the importance of considering all objections and case laws cited by the assessee for a fair decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1281 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288938</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under Section 263. The CIT&#039;s invocation of revisionary powers was deemed unjustified as it relied on the AO&#039;s proposal without independent assessment. The Tribunal found the CIT&#039;s directions were a re-evaluation of existing facts, not permissible under Section 263. It emphasized the importance of considering all objections and case laws cited by the assessee for a fair decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>