<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1813 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288944</link>
    <description>The Advocates Act confers the right to practise law only on enrolled advocates, and a non-advocate may appear only with the Court&#039;s permission in a particular case. Order III CPC allows appearance through recognised agents, but that procedural facility does not override the prohibition against unauthorised practice. A power of attorney holder may act for the principal and, where permitted, appear in Court, but does not acquire a general right of audience or a right to plead as of course. Accordingly, a power of attorney holder who is not enrolled as an advocate has no right to address the Court on behalf of the principal, and the preliminary objection was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616814" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1813 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288944</link>
      <description>The Advocates Act confers the right to practise law only on enrolled advocates, and a non-advocate may appear only with the Court&#039;s permission in a particular case. Order III CPC allows appearance through recognised agents, but that procedural facility does not override the prohibition against unauthorised practice. A power of attorney holder may act for the principal and, where permitted, appear in Court, but does not acquire a general right of audience or a right to plead as of course. Accordingly, a power of attorney holder who is not enrolled as an advocate has no right to address the Court on behalf of the principal, and the preliminary objection was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>