<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1767 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288945</link>
    <description>Notice of motion was directed only to respondents Nos. 1 to 4 for the fixed date, and service by process dasti was permitted. The writ petition was ordered to be heard along with CWP No. 27730 of 2017, and in the meantime the NCLT, Chandigarh was restrained from passing any final order. These were interim procedural directions preserving the status quo pending joint consideration of the connected matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:16:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616813" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1767 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288945</link>
      <description>Notice of motion was directed only to respondents Nos. 1 to 4 for the fixed date, and service by process dasti was permitted. The writ petition was ordered to be heard along with CWP No. 27730 of 2017, and in the meantime the NCLT, Chandigarh was restrained from passing any final order. These were interim procedural directions preserving the status quo pending joint consideration of the connected matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>