<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (1) TMI 103 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22679</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the balance-sheet value, reflecting depreciation computed on the straight-line method, should be used for valuing unquoted shares for wealth-tax purposes. The directors&#039; report containing depreciation details as per the Income-tax Rules does not form part of the balance-sheet and cannot be considered for valuation adjustments. The court&#039;s decision aligns with the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, the Companies Act, and relevant judicial precedents, affirming the balance-sheet as the primary basis for asset valuation. The question referred to the court was answered in favor of the Revenue, with costs awarded to the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:47:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (1) TMI 103 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22679</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the balance-sheet value, reflecting depreciation computed on the straight-line method, should be used for valuing unquoted shares for wealth-tax purposes. The directors&#039; report containing depreciation details as per the Income-tax Rules does not form part of the balance-sheet and cannot be considered for valuation adjustments. The court&#039;s decision aligns with the provisions of the Wealth-tax Act, the Companies Act, and relevant judicial precedents, affirming the balance-sheet as the primary basis for asset valuation. The question referred to the court was answered in favor of the Revenue, with costs awarded to the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>