<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 133 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396464</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, quashing the Tribunal&#039;s orders and remitting the matter for a fresh decision on merits. The Court clarified the application of Sections 153(2A) and 153(3) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of accurate statutory interpretation for timely and lawful assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 133 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396464</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court ruled in favor of the revenue, quashing the Tribunal&#039;s orders and remitting the matter for a fresh decision on merits. The Court clarified the application of Sections 153(2A) and 153(3) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of accurate statutory interpretation for timely and lawful assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>