<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 130 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,05,150. The decision emphasized that retracted statements and unsupported allegations could not justify additions, highlighting the importance of substantive evidence in tax matters. The outcome favored the assessee, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 20:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 130 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs. 1,05,150. The decision emphasized that retracted statements and unsupported allegations could not justify additions, highlighting the importance of substantive evidence in tax matters. The outcome favored the assessee, leading to the deletion of the disputed amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>