<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 128 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the case to the AO for a fresh decision, directing the use of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for valuation. The AO was instructed to adhere to the DCF method as chosen by the assessee and scrutinize the valuation report accordingly. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the AO required to comply with the directives in line with the Bombay High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2020 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 128 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the case to the AO for a fresh decision, directing the use of the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method for valuation. The AO was instructed to adhere to the DCF method as chosen by the assessee and scrutinize the valuation report accordingly. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the AO required to comply with the directives in line with the Bombay High Court&#039;s ruling in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>