<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 127 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396458</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 2000-01. The decision emphasized the necessity for clear charges in the notice for penalty proceedings and the requirement for the Assessing Officer to prove concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income before imposing a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:45:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 127 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396458</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Year 2000-01. The decision emphasized the necessity for clear charges in the notice for penalty proceedings and the requirement for the Assessing Officer to prove concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income before imposing a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>