https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396450 The Tribunal rejected the appellants' applications for a stay or status quo order regarding the operation of the cell phones seized by the Enforcement Directorate. The Tribunal found that granting such relief would interfere with the ongoing investigation and emphasized its limited jurisdiction to decide constitutional issues or violations of private rights in relation to the investigation. The Tribunal highlighted the statutory provisions governing search and seizure under the PMLA and upheld the retention of records, including digital devices, for investigative purposes for a specified duration. en-us Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2020 14:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396450 The Tribunal rejected the appellants' applications for a stay or status quo order regarding the operation of the cell phones seized by the Enforcement Directorate. The Tribunal found that granting such relief would interfere with the ongoing investigation and emphasized its limited jurisdiction to decide constitutional issues or violations of private rights in relation to the investigation. The Tribunal highlighted the statutory provisions governing search and seizure under the PMLA and upheld the retention of records, including digital devices, for investigative purposes for a specified duration. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396450