<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 115 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396446</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the items in question were eligible for CENVAT Credit based on recent High Court judgments. The demand for recovery was set aside, and the compliance issue with Rule 4 of CCR 2004 was deemed irrelevant due to the passage of time. The impugned order was overturned, granting relief to the appellant in accordance with the established admissibility of CENVAT Credit on steel and cement items used for machinery installation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 115 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396446</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the items in question were eligible for CENVAT Credit based on recent High Court judgments. The demand for recovery was set aside, and the compliance issue with Rule 4 of CCR 2004 was deemed irrelevant due to the passage of time. The impugned order was overturned, granting relief to the appellant in accordance with the established admissibility of CENVAT Credit on steel and cement items used for machinery installation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>