<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22674</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to deduction of notional capital gains tax under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The decision was based on the precedent set in Bharat Hari Singhania v. CWT [1979] 119 ITR 258 (All).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:35:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 89 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22674</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the assessee was not entitled to deduction of notional capital gains tax under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The decision was based on the precedent set in Bharat Hari Singhania v. CWT [1979] 119 ITR 258 (All).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>