https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22673 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, a registered partnership firm, in a case challenging the legality and validity of a notice issued by the Tax Recovery Officer for attaching premises due to purported dues. The court found that the petitioners had fulfilled their obligations under section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by providing necessary information at the time of purchase and that the Department did not object within a reasonable timeframe. The court quashed the notice and held that the Department had no valid grounds for attaching the premises purchased by the petitioners in 1984. en-us Mon, 30 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:01:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22673 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, a registered partnership firm, in a case challenging the legality and validity of a notice issued by the Tax Recovery Officer for attaching premises due to purported dues. The court found that the petitioners had fulfilled their obligations under section 281 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, by providing necessary information at the time of purchase and that the Department did not object within a reasonable timeframe. The court quashed the notice and held that the Department had no valid grounds for attaching the premises purchased by the petitioners in 1984. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 30 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22673