<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 1641 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288912</link>
    <description>A duly authorised power agent may appear and argue for an applicant before the NCLT when written authority is produced. A loan claim is not defeated merely because the lender did not file income-tax returns, where the debt is supported by an acknowledgment letter, promissory note, cheque and cash book entries. Alleged non-compliance with the RBI foreign borrowing framework did not invalidate the cash loan on the facts, and a regulatory breach would not automatically render the transaction void. The absence of entries in the corporate debtor&#039;s books also did not discredit the claim, as the signed cheque attracted a statutory presumption and the debtor failed to rebut the supporting documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2020 15:18:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 1641 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288912</link>
      <description>A duly authorised power agent may appear and argue for an applicant before the NCLT when written authority is produced. A loan claim is not defeated merely because the lender did not file income-tax returns, where the debt is supported by an acknowledgment letter, promissory note, cheque and cash book entries. Alleged non-compliance with the RBI foreign borrowing framework did not invalidate the cash loan on the facts, and a regulatory breach would not automatically render the transaction void. The absence of entries in the corporate debtor&#039;s books also did not discredit the claim, as the signed cheque attracted a statutory presumption and the debtor failed to rebut the supporting documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>