<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 88 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22671</link>
    <description>Reassessment notices issued after four years and beyond eight years were treated as distinct categories under the then-section 151: approval of the Commissioner applied to the former, while Board approval alone sufficed for the latter, with no cumulative approval requirement. A notice otherwise time-barred under section 147(b) could not be saved by section 150(1) read with Explanation 3 to section 153 unless the affected person had notice and an opportunity of hearing on the earlier finding or direction. Tribunal observations may nonetheless furnish sufficient material for the Assessing Officer&#039;s reason to believe under section 147(a), leaving the truth of the escaped-income allegation to reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:57:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 88 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22671</link>
      <description>Reassessment notices issued after four years and beyond eight years were treated as distinct categories under the then-section 151: approval of the Commissioner applied to the former, while Board approval alone sufficed for the latter, with no cumulative approval requirement. A notice otherwise time-barred under section 147(b) could not be saved by section 150(1) read with Explanation 3 to section 153 unless the affected person had notice and an opportunity of hearing on the earlier finding or direction. Tribunal observations may nonetheless furnish sufficient material for the Assessing Officer&#039;s reason to believe under section 147(a), leaving the truth of the escaped-income allegation to reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>