<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 110 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396441</link>
    <description>The application was not admitted as the applicant failed to provide essential details of the supply for seeking an advance ruling. The rejection was due to the lack of transaction specifics required to assess eligibility for a concessional tax rate under Notification 11/2017-CT (Rate) for works contract services related to elevators and escalators in buildings with multiple residential units and single residential units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 110 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396441</link>
      <description>The application was not admitted as the applicant failed to provide essential details of the supply for seeking an advance ruling. The rejection was due to the lack of transaction specifics required to assess eligibility for a concessional tax rate under Notification 11/2017-CT (Rate) for works contract services related to elevators and escalators in buildings with multiple residential units and single residential units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>