<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (8) TMI 178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288902</link>
    <description>Once a final town planning scheme becomes operative as a legislative measure, an occupier&#039;s right to remain in possession can cease without reservation, and summary eviction may follow as an administrative step to enforce the scheme. The Court held that non-compliance with individual notice requirements at the reconstitution stage did not invalidate the scheme once it had statutory force. It further held that the summary eviction machinery applied where the real issue was cessation of the right to occupy, even if a building stood on the plot, and that a prior adjudicatory show-cause process was not required. The eviction notices were also upheld as not shown to be unreasonably short.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 17:42:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (8) TMI 178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288902</link>
      <description>Once a final town planning scheme becomes operative as a legislative measure, an occupier&#039;s right to remain in possession can cease without reservation, and summary eviction may follow as an administrative step to enforce the scheme. The Court held that non-compliance with individual notice requirements at the reconstitution stage did not invalidate the scheme once it had statutory force. It further held that the summary eviction machinery applied where the real issue was cessation of the right to occupy, even if a building stood on the plot, and that a prior adjudicatory show-cause process was not required. The eviction notices were also upheld as not shown to be unreasonably short.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>