<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1868 (12) TMI 1 - CALCUTTAHIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288890</link>
    <description>The High Court concluded that the respondent was the illegitimate son of the former zemindar and entitled to maintenance. The Court directed a determination on whether maintenance should be paid from the zamindari income or other property, with the potential for further inquiry. The decrees of the Zilla Court and the High Court were recommended for reversal, and no costs were awarded for the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1868 00:00:00 +0553</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 13:42:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1868 (12) TMI 1 - CALCUTTAHIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288890</link>
      <description>The High Court concluded that the respondent was the illegitimate son of the former zemindar and entitled to maintenance. The Court directed a determination on whether maintenance should be paid from the zamindari income or other property, with the potential for further inquiry. The decrees of the Zilla Court and the High Court were recommended for reversal, and no costs were awarded for the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1868 00:00:00 +0553</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>