<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (6) TMI 184 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288884</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the Corporation to pay the insurance benefits with interest. It held that the delayed premium payment did not affect the policy&#039;s validity, entitling the petitioner to relief under the policy as the premium was eventually accepted by the Corporation. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to policy terms and public interest in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 11:49:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (6) TMI 184 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288884</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the Corporation to pay the insurance benefits with interest. It held that the delayed premium payment did not affect the policy&#039;s validity, entitling the petitioner to relief under the policy as the premium was eventually accepted by the Corporation. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to policy terms and public interest in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>