https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288882 In motor accident claims, a driver alleged to be negligent is not invariably a formally impleaded necessary party, but an adverse negligence finding cannot be recorded unless he has an effective opportunity to meet the allegation; where he participates in the proceedings and is examined, that fairness requirement is satisfied. Concurrent findings by the Tribunal and High Court that the appellant drove the bus rashly and negligently were based on the evidence and showed no legal infirmity or perversity, so appellate interference was unwarranted. The appeal therefore failed and the adverse decision against the appellant was sustained. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2020 10:58:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288882 In motor accident claims, a driver alleged to be negligent is not invariably a formally impleaded necessary party, but an adverse negligence finding cannot be recorded unless he has an effective opportunity to meet the allegation; where he participates in the proceedings and is examined, that fairness requirement is satisfied. Concurrent findings by the Tribunal and High Court that the appellant drove the bus rashly and negligently were based on the evidence and showed no legal infirmity or perversity, so appellate interference was unwarranted. The appeal therefore failed and the adverse decision against the appellant was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288882