https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396418 The Tribunal emphasized the importance of promptly resolving Stay Petitions before disposing of appeals, highlighting the necessity of addressing pending matters promptly. The judgment clarified that appellants must deposit 7.5% of confirmed dues under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, rejecting alternative security adjustments. Despite financial constraints, non-compliance with Section 35F led to the dismissal of appeals, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for appeal eligibility. The Tribunal ultimately dismissed the appeals and related applications due to non-payment, underscoring the significance of compliance with statutory provisions. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396418 The Tribunal emphasized the importance of promptly resolving Stay Petitions before disposing of appeals, highlighting the necessity of addressing pending matters promptly. The judgment clarified that appellants must deposit 7.5% of confirmed dues under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, rejecting alternative security adjustments. Despite financial constraints, non-compliance with Section 35F led to the dismissal of appeals, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for appeal eligibility. The Tribunal ultimately dismissed the appeals and related applications due to non-payment, underscoring the significance of compliance with statutory provisions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396418