<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 86 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396417</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal itself. The Tribunal found the reasons provided for the delay insufficient and unjustified, emphasizing the importance of adhering to time limits for filing appeals. Despite having the power to condone delays, the Tribunal concluded that the reasons presented did not meet the criteria of a &quot;sufficient cause&quot; under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. This case underscores the necessity for appellants to demonstrate valid and sufficient reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings to comply with statutory timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 09:59:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 86 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396417</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi dismissed the Department&#039;s application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, leading to the dismissal of the appeal itself. The Tribunal found the reasons provided for the delay insufficient and unjustified, emphasizing the importance of adhering to time limits for filing appeals. Despite having the power to condone delays, the Tribunal concluded that the reasons presented did not meet the criteria of a &quot;sufficient cause&quot; under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. This case underscores the necessity for appellants to demonstrate valid and sufficient reasons for seeking condonation of delay in legal proceedings to comply with statutory timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>