https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396416 The appeal was allowed by remand as the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that they filed the appeal within the prescribed time limit under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's argument of being unaware of the adjudication order due to unrest at the factory premises was considered, and the Tribunal gave them the benefit of the doubt. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for further proceedings, directing the Commissioner (Appeal) to decide the issue on its merits. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Jul 2020 09:35:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396416 The appeal was allowed by remand as the Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that they filed the appeal within the prescribed time limit under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's argument of being unaware of the adjudication order due to unrest at the factory premises was considered, and the Tribunal gave them the benefit of the doubt. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for further proceedings, directing the Commissioner (Appeal) to decide the issue on its merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396416