<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1597 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288874</link>
    <description>The application concerned directions for the Official Liquidator to take possession of the vessel MT Polaris, which was described as effectively abandoned despite a subsisting charter. The Official Liquidator did not object to taking possession, but required that the Applicant bear the expenses of taking possession and the costs of manning the vessel after possession. The Applicant accepted that condition, and possession was directed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 09:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1597 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288874</link>
      <description>The application concerned directions for the Official Liquidator to take possession of the vessel MT Polaris, which was described as effectively abandoned despite a subsisting charter. The Official Liquidator did not object to taking possession, but required that the Applicant bear the expenses of taking possession and the costs of manning the vessel after possession. The Applicant accepted that condition, and possession was directed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>