<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 82 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396413</link>
    <description>The authority ruled that the applicant is not eligible to claim input tax credit on GST paid for inputs and input services used in the construction of a commercial immovable property intended for renting, as per Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The decision was influenced by consistent rulings in similar cases and the pending appeal in the Safari Retreats case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 82 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396413</link>
      <description>The authority ruled that the applicant is not eligible to claim input tax credit on GST paid for inputs and input services used in the construction of a commercial immovable property intended for renting, as per Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act. The decision was influenced by consistent rulings in similar cases and the pending appeal in the Safari Retreats case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>