<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 80 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396411</link>
    <description>The ruling authority rejected the application as not maintainable due to the applicant&#039;s lack of involvement in the supply of goods or services. The issues concerning the applicability of IGST under the reverse charge mechanism and the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) were left unanswered as the primary question was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 80 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396411</link>
      <description>The ruling authority rejected the application as not maintainable due to the applicant&#039;s lack of involvement in the supply of goods or services. The issues concerning the applicability of IGST under the reverse charge mechanism and the eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) were left unanswered as the primary question was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396411</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>