<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (7) TMI 70 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396401</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, deleting several additions under various sections as they were either explained or related to future projections, not actual transactions. The tribunal stressed the need to consider the overall context and evidence before making additions based on seized documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2020 12:20:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (7) TMI 70 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396401</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, deleting several additions under various sections as they were either explained or related to future projections, not actual transactions. The tribunal stressed the need to consider the overall context and evidence before making additions based on seized documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>