https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288861 In a suit for specific performance, a subsequent transferee can resist enforcement only by proving that he purchased for value, in good faith and without notice of the prior contract under Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act. The burden of establishing that statutory exception lies on the transferee once the prior contract is shown. Here, the purchasers failed to prove payment of consideration or bona fide purchase without notice, and the plaintiff's possession required them to make proper inquiry. Specific performance was therefore enforceable against the subsequent purchasers. en-us Wed, 27 Feb 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:23:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288861 In a suit for specific performance, a subsequent transferee can resist enforcement only by proving that he purchased for value, in good faith and without notice of the prior contract under Section 27 of the Specific Relief Act. The burden of establishing that statutory exception lies on the transferee once the prior contract is shown. Here, the purchasers failed to prove payment of consideration or bona fide purchase without notice, and the plaintiff's possession required them to make proper inquiry. Specific performance was therefore enforceable against the subsequent purchasers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Feb 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288861