https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288860 A subsequent purchaser was protected as a transferee for value in good faith and without notice, so the claim for specific performance could not be enforced against him. The Court held that the governing provision was Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, not Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act. Under Section 19(b), the relevant test is whether the transferee paid value in good faith and without notice of the original contract; it does not require proof of reasonable enquiries into the transferor's power to transfer. On the evidence, those ingredients were satisfied, and protection was available. en-us Mon, 15 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:18:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288860 A subsequent purchaser was protected as a transferee for value in good faith and without notice, so the claim for specific performance could not be enforced against him. The Court held that the governing provision was Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act, not Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act. Under Section 19(b), the relevant test is whether the transferee paid value in good faith and without notice of the original contract; it does not require proof of reasonable enquiries into the transferor's power to transfer. On the evidence, those ingredients were satisfied, and protection was available. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288860