https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288859 In a specific performance suit against subsequent transferees, the transferee claiming protection as a bona fide purchaser for value without notice must prove that exception; the plaintiff is not required to disprove notice once the contract is established. An agreement for sale does not, by itself, require the plaintiff to show an immediate right to possession before seeking specific performance, because possession follows execution of the conveyance. Where the first appellate court failed to decide material questions on notice, the differing positions of the defendants, and the sale documents, the judgment was incomplete and unsafe, justifying remand for retrial. en-us Fri, 27 Jun 1924 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Jul 2020 10:12:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288859 In a specific performance suit against subsequent transferees, the transferee claiming protection as a bona fide purchaser for value without notice must prove that exception; the plaintiff is not required to disprove notice once the contract is established. An agreement for sale does not, by itself, require the plaintiff to show an immediate right to possession before seeking specific performance, because possession follows execution of the conveyance. Where the first appellate court failed to decide material questions on notice, the differing positions of the defendants, and the sale documents, the judgment was incomplete and unsafe, justifying remand for retrial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Jun 1924 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288859