<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (10) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288853</link>
    <description>Mandatory joinder applies where an election petition alleges corrupt practice against a candidate. Non-joinder is fatal and cannot be waived merely because the objection was not raised in the written statement; the Court must ensure compliance, and the objection may be raised later as a question of law apparent from the petition. A pleading must be read as a whole to determine whether it contains material facts constituting the corrupt-practice charge. Allegations that a candidate and election workers, acting with consent, threatened an elector to prevent voting or canvassing contained the essential facts; further details were particulars rather than prerequisites. The unjoined candidate&#039;s alleged corrupt practice rendered the petition liable to dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:01:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=616507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (10) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288853</link>
      <description>Mandatory joinder applies where an election petition alleges corrupt practice against a candidate. Non-joinder is fatal and cannot be waived merely because the objection was not raised in the written statement; the Court must ensure compliance, and the objection may be raised later as a question of law apparent from the petition. A pleading must be read as a whole to determine whether it contains material facts constituting the corrupt-practice charge. Allegations that a candidate and election workers, acting with consent, threatened an elector to prevent voting or canvassing contained the essential facts; further details were particulars rather than prerequisites. The unjoined candidate&#039;s alleged corrupt practice rendered the petition liable to dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>