https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288846 Accrued rights to execute decrees remain protected despite repeal or replacement of a limitation regime unless legislation clearly and expressly removes the existing remedy. Article 165 of the Bikaner State Limitation Act continued to preserve execution rights arising from a former Bikaner High Court decree. Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act could apply because a sovereign ruler's proclamation establishing a High Court was treated, in substance, as equivalent to a Royal Charter. An execution proceeding consigned to record without final merits disposal may be revived after removal of the relevant impediment. Execution was therefore maintainable, with the revival application sustained. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:36:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288846 Accrued rights to execute decrees remain protected despite repeal or replacement of a limitation regime unless legislation clearly and expressly removes the existing remedy. Article 165 of the Bikaner State Limitation Act continued to preserve execution rights arising from a former Bikaner High Court decree. Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act could apply because a sovereign ruler's proclamation establishing a High Court was treated, in substance, as equivalent to a Royal Charter. An execution proceeding consigned to record without final merits disposal may be revived after removal of the relevant impediment. Execution was therefore maintainable, with the revival application sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288846