https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288846 The article examines execution of a decree of the former Bikaner High Court after repeal of the earlier limitation regime. It states that, absent clear legislative intent or adequate saving provision, a later limitation law should not retrospectively extinguish an accrued remedy to execute an existing decree, and the earlier limitation protection may continue. It also discusses a purposive reading of Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, treating a sovereign ruler's proclamation establishing a High Court as functionally akin to a Royal Charter for limitation purposes. Finally, it notes that an execution application may be treated as a revival of an earlier pending proceeding where the case was only consigned to record and not finally disposed of. en-us Fri, 01 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 02 Jul 2020 11:36:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288846 The article examines execution of a decree of the former Bikaner High Court after repeal of the earlier limitation regime. It states that, absent clear legislative intent or adequate saving provision, a later limitation law should not retrospectively extinguish an accrued remedy to execute an existing decree, and the earlier limitation protection may continue. It also discusses a purposive reading of Article 183 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, treating a sovereign ruler's proclamation establishing a High Court as functionally akin to a Royal Charter for limitation purposes. Finally, it notes that an execution application may be treated as a revival of an earlier pending proceeding where the case was only consigned to record and not finally disposed of. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288846